Private listings: every option, honestly explained.

← All broker notes

By Kasey Jorgenson, designated broker, Jorgenson Real Estate · October 3, 2026

The short version: Clear Cooperation still requires MLS entry within one business day of public marketing, but since 2025 sellers can choose delayed marketing or an office exclusive by signing a certification. In Austin, an Unlock MLS Flex listing keeps a home off the portals while every MLS agent can still show it. The price data is contested, and any premium is paid by a buyer. In Texas, keeping a sale price out of the MLS can also matter for property taxes. Sellers should hear every option and who each one leaves out.

“Coming soon.” “Private exclusive.” “Office exclusive.” “Pre-market.” If it feels like the rules for how a home gets marketed changed in the last year and a half, they did. Some of it is good for sellers, some of it needs more scrutiny, and almost all of it is being explained badly.

My position is simple: sellers should always have options, and we should be able to offer every one of them. But a seller can only choose well if someone lays out all of the options, and the tradeoffs, honestly.

What changed

• Clear Cooperation (2020). NAR’s Clear Cooperation Policy requires a listing broker to put a listing into the MLS within one business day of marketing it to the public, whether by yard sign, website, email blast, or a network shared across brokerages. It’s still in effect.
• Multiple Listing Options for Sellers (2025). In March 2025, NAR added two exceptions. A “delayed marketing” listing goes into the MLS, where every agent can see it, show it, and write offers, but public sites are held back for a period. An “office exclusive” stays inside one brokerage and isn’t publicly marketed. Both require the seller to sign a certification acknowledging what they’re giving up.
• Brokers must explain every option (2026). NAR’s July 2026 guidance says brokers must explain all listing options and how each one serves the seller, and listing statuses must accurately show whether a home is available.
• The portals and the courts. Zillow first moved to ban listings marketed elsewhere before the MLS, then launched its own pre-market listings in March 2026, and Compass dropped its lawsuit against Zillow the next day. A Seattle MLS settled with Compass by creating a “First Look” status. In Zillow’s separate suit against Compass and Chicago’s MLS, a judge in September sent the MLS claims to arbitration and paused the case against Compass, with no ruling on the merits.
• The biggest brokerage got bigger. Compass closed its acquisition of Anywhere (Coldwell Banker, Century 21, Sotheby’s International Realty, Corcoran, and others) in January 2026, creating a network of roughly 340,000 agents including franchises.

What a Central Texas seller can actually choose

Here in the Unlock MLS market, a seller has three real paths:

1. Full MLS, right away. The listing goes everywhere: every agent, every portal, every buyer. It’s the largest possible buyer pool and the least privacy.
2. An Unlock MLS “Flex” listing. It’s in the MLS, so every Unlock agent and their buyers can see it, show it, and make offers. It isn’t sent to IDX websites or syndicated, and it only appears on the big portals if the seller says so. Days on market don’t accrue and price changes aren’t tracked, there’s no time limit, and showings, open houses, and yard signs are allowed. The seller’s choice should be documented on Unlock’s Marketing Options & Disclosure form.
3. An office exclusive. Only one brokerage’s agents see it, and it isn’t marketed publicly. It offers the most privacy and the smallest buyer pool, and it requires a signed seller certification.

There are good reasons to choose something other than the full MLS: privacy, safety, a divorce or an estate, a renovation still underway, or a seller who wants to test a price quietly. NAR’s own guidance recognizes that.

The Texas twist: sale prices and property taxes

Texas is a non-disclosure state. Sale prices aren’t public record and the state can’t make anyone report them, so the MLS is where most sold prices actually live. Appraisal districts want those numbers. In 2019, KXAN reported that the Travis Central Appraisal District had spent nearly $100,000 on home sales data, purchased through the company that ran the Austin Board of REALTORS®’ MLS. The board objected to that sale and later settled with its vendor.

That’s a big reason some high-end sellers keep their homes off the MLS entirely. A recorded sale price becomes a data point that can follow the home, and the neighborhood, into future appraisals. It’s a legitimate concern and a real tradeoff for the seller to weigh, not a loophole.

Commercial real estate has worked this way for decades. Most commercial property trades through broker networks, email blasts, agents’ and brokerages’ own sites, and platforms like Crexi, CoStar, and LoopNet rather than an MLS.

Does keeping it private get a better price? The data is contested

Here’s what each side says, in its own words and numbers:

• Compass reported in July 2026 that homes that started as a private exclusive or coming soon sold for 4.6% more and went under contract 34% faster, across about 70,800 closings. Its study counts closed sales only.
• Zillow reported in May 2026 that homes sold entirely off the MLS sold for about 1.3% less, with larger gaps for lower-priced homes and in communities of color.
• ARELLO, the association of real estate license regulators, studied more than 10 million transactions in September 2026. It found private listings sold about 0.9% to 1.3% below MLS listings, while coming-soon listings sold about 1.2% to 1.6% above. It cautioned that the data doesn’t establish causation.

One more piece of logic: if a premium is real, a buyer paid it. Compass’s study doesn’t say who those buyers were or who represented them. When the buyer’s agent works at the same firm as the listing agent, Texas makes that firm an intermediary with duties to both sides, and a higher price is good for one client and costs the other. Buyers deserve to ask about that as much as sellers do.

Read together, the studies suggest a real distinction. Pre-marketing a home that then goes to the MLS and never putting it on the MLS at all look like two different things. Anyone who tells a seller the answer is settled is overselling.

The part sellers should think hard about

Options are good. But when one firm has a very large share of the agents and listings in a market, a listing kept inside that firm reaches that firm’s buyers first, and only that firm’s buyers. The seller may still get a good result. The question is whether they knowingly traded away the rest of the market, and who benefits from the trade.

Fair housing advocates have raised the same concern from the buyer’s side. When something is exclusive, someone is excluded, and historically that hasn’t been random. That’s the reason Clear Cooperation exists.

In Texas, a broker has to put the client’s interests above everyone else’s, including the broker’s own, and has to tell the client material information (Tex. Occ. Code §1101.557). How many buyers will never see the home is material.

Questions every seller should ask before going private

• Which buyers will see my home under each option, and which won’t?
• If the buyer comes from inside your brokerage, will you be an intermediary? What does that change for me?
• What happens, and when, if it doesn’t sell privately? Will the time off-market count against me later?
• What does the price data actually show, and who published it?
• Will my sale price end up in the MLS, and does that matter for my property taxes?
• Can I switch to the full MLS whenever I want?

Good agents will welcome every one of those questions. That’s the standard we hold ourselves to: lay out every option, show the tradeoffs, and let the seller decide.

General information, not legal advice. TREC says I can’t practice law, and I like my license. Run your specific situation past your broker or a real estate attorney.

← All broker notes · Get The Debrief monthly → · Talk with us →